Comments on: Whiz reveals a bit more

By: darrenurban

darrenurban — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:36:47 +0000

Jake –

Wish I could be more helpful. Ultimately the gamble, if you look at it that way, is gambling whether the Vikings win at home against the Giants. If you think the Vikes will win, I’d shy away from Warner. If you think the Giants win, go with Warner. And for goodness sake, get your league to shorten its season so it ends no later than Week 16. Having a championship game in Week 17 is ridiculous.

By: jake

jake — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:32:06 +0000

Figured I would strike this source for some helpful guidance. I have Warner on my fantasy team, and im down to the championship game. I know whether he plays is dictated upon the vikings winning or losing overall…but I have to lock in my selections well before the 4pm game for my starting roster. Do I go and pick up brunell or moore of the panthers and start them or take the gamble and start warner?

Thanks for any help
jake from bmore.

GO RAVENS!

By: steve

steve — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:50:07 +0000

very nice…

By: doug

doug — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:21:35 +0000

Steve,
Our record against the NFC-North is 3-0; NFC-East is 1-0; and NFC-South is 0-1. Overall we are 4-1 agaisnt the rest of the NFC and 4-2 against the NFC-West. We would have won 10 or more games from any of the NFC divisions in my opinion.

By: steve

steve — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:42:54 +0000

kevin…you sound like i may have offended you……not the intention….for example i thought the tenn game was one of their better efoorts even with warner out….cards dont seem to beat themselves to often anymore……thats all i meant….i still believe cards are again flying under the radar….loving the greenbay matchup…should be an awesome game….

By: steve

steve — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:39:08 +0000

hey only my wife calls me a dork…oh and my stepdaughter…

By: steve

steve — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:37:13 +0000

i didnt say the rams and seahawks didnt count….but i think we can all admit any other division and we might not be at 10 wins ..anyway…..i dont think it matters who the cards play..if they play like we all know they can…they will be fine….

By: Kevin

Kevin — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:21:46 +0000

Ok….so the rams and seahawks dont count huh?, then comment on the vikings game. The Cards have had 3 “complete” games, (if that is even measured) and 10 real wins. I don’t care about complete games, just wins, but the vikings, rams, and seahawks were also pretty solid.

On a side note….thanks Darren for the way you keep the blog and stories up! I log on at least twice a day to check for anything new!

By: Jerry

Jerry — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:03:46 +0000

I’d love to not see the packers twice in a row. Hopefully things pan out and we get a visit from the cowgirls and their football team.

I’d also love to see Rackers and Rolle back in time for the playoffs. We need Rolles energy and competetive nature. We also need Rackers sure-fire leg and foot. I give him props for trying to play through he, he did a pretty bang up job considering.

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:20:32 +0000

Steve? You are now officially a complete and total dork.