It’s as regular as taxes being due in April — a player is released, especially this time of year, and within minutes (seconds, sometimes) someone on Twitter asks if the Cardinals will be interested in him. It does not seem to matter the circumstances upon which the player was released, or where he might be in his career, or even that he’d probably just be redundant on the Cardinals’ roster with a player they already have. The questions come anyway. There have been times — few, but they have happened — when a guy is reported to be released and when I look into it, my sources hadn’t even heard he was cut yet. (Because sometimes he hasn’t officially been yet and the agent is leaking info.)
Here’s the thing: If a player is released, there usually is a reason. And while it can be for strictly monetary reasons, often, there is usually a parallel that includes some variation that the team doesn’t think the player is worth the current contract anymore — and so he’s cut.
Once in a while, it’s mostly about the money. The Cardinals want to keep Darnell Dockett, but at a price they deem better than what he was going to make, and Dockett wanted to test the market. That makes a ton of sense from Dockett’s perspective. But almost all the other guys released thus far aren’t going back and never were wanted back. That doesn’t mean they can’t contribute to a new team, but no matter how glittery the name, the players at the peak of their careers aren’t just cut. They guys flooding the market now are older, their play is declining, injuries have taken their toll, or all of the above.
Plus, when free agency starts, there will be even more players from which to pick and choose. Some are worth a lot of dough, others are like the guys being cut — they aren’t worth what they might be asking for anymore.
Just something to keep in mind the next time you see that the _____ just released ______ and want to jump to “Will the Cardinals try and get him?”
Tags: free agency
Posted in Blog | 39 Comments »